This is part two of a three part series by Elena Meredith about Reconfiguring Anti-racism; Tolerance, Harmony, Inclusion or Justice – an international conference hosted by the Centre for citizenship and globalisation at Deakin University, Melbourne December 2013. Post one summarised her views on the conversation around conference themes ‘Tolerance’ and ‘Harmony’. Part two discusses her experience of the conference discourse around ‘Inclusion’ and ‘Justice’.
Inclusion
Being based in Australia, much of the focus on this aspect was couched in conversations about and experiments on promoting multiculturalism (the “M” word) which was described in populist and political contexts as “being in crisis”. Allan Lentin suggested that this “Australian” view is “the contemporary articulation of racism”. She explored the concepts of:
- “good diversity” which is seen to add colour, richness and individuality and can become a USP (Unique Selling Point) and
- “bad diversity” which is seen to impede progress, based on the belief that society has been “too tolerant of difference”.
Lentin’s fear is that with an orthodoxy uniting left and right, society may be “sleepwalking to segregation” with a focus on a return to “national values” and a positive teaching of the colonial past. This resonated for me as a familiar scenario and likely outcome in Aotearoa also.





